tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926797628907068921.post400772490068131544..comments2021-06-24T16:40:53.611-04:00Comments on Common Sense Barrage: Taxes, Taxes, and more Taxes....and some Judges too.Grouchy Historianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03346708684230164227noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926797628907068921.post-29910455343722827242012-02-26T21:33:00.986-05:002012-02-26T21:33:00.986-05:00Here is another site that supports the one I am us...Here is another site that supports the one I am using:<br /><br />http://www.anamericanvision.com/freedom_documents/anti_federalist_papers/<br /><br />Here also, is another site that supports the one you are using:<br /><br />http://constitution.org/afp/afpchron.htm<br /><br />The site I just listed, which aligns itself with your discussion of the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, seems to be the more correct. Why do you think there exists this conflict? I am curious. Suspicious, too. Is this just an anomaly of interpretation, or is someone trying to re-write our history for us?<br /><br />Mitch MillerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926797628907068921.post-68687327325269653332012-02-26T21:21:58.747-05:002012-02-26T21:21:58.747-05:00Grouchy,
The comments you attribute to, "Brut...Grouchy,<br />The comments you attribute to, "Brutus," as being Anti-Federalist No. 12 are put forth on the site I am using, as Anti-Federalist No. 17. One of them is obviously wrong. We need to find out which one before proceeding any further.<br /><br />Mitch MillerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926797628907068921.post-11648760732973346292012-02-26T21:12:05.646-05:002012-02-26T21:12:05.646-05:00Grouchy,
Here is the site I am using for the Anti-...Grouchy,<br />Here is the site I am using for the Anti-Federalist Papers:<br /><br />http://www.iahushua.com/hist/AntiFED.html<br /><br />MitchAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926797628907068921.post-23482535428177523132012-02-26T17:56:53.084-05:002012-02-26T17:56:53.084-05:00Hmm according to this link this is anti-federalist...Hmm according to this link this is anti-federalist 12<br /><br />http://www.constitution.org/afp/brutus12.htm<br /><br /> I can double check in my book.Grouchy Historianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03346708684230164227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926797628907068921.post-68409279323278092102012-02-25T21:27:05.720-05:002012-02-25T21:27:05.720-05:00Excellent analysis, Grouchy Historian. Could it b...Excellent analysis, Grouchy Historian. Could it be that, "Reaganomics," had it's beginning in the reading of Hamilton's words, in Federalist No. 12? Part of what Hamilton said, was what Conservatives are still saying today. Let the Federal Government get out of the way of Commerce. From Commerce and Commerce alone will you have the tax revenues necessary to run the affairs of Government.<br /><br />Regarding the Anti-Federalist position, I am confused by your post. Your comments are about Brutus and the Judicial powers of Government. Anti-Federalist No. 12 was written by, "Cincinnatus," was it not? He talks about the raising of revenues and the difficulty encountered in doing that. Please explain what I missed.<br /><br />Mitch MillerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com